Practical Christianity:  The Weight of What We Teach Part 3: Borrowed Fire

(Part 3 of 5)

Floatie:  The Name Is Not a Formula

Acts 19:13–15  (13)Then some of the itinerant Jewish exorcists undertook to invoke the name of the Lord Jesus over those who had evil spirits, saying, “I adjure you by the Jesus whom Paul proclaims.”  (14)Seven sons of a Jewish high priest named Sceva were doing this.  (15)But the evil spirit answered them, “Jesus I know, and Paul I recognize, but who are you?”(ESV)

The sons of Sceva used the right words.  They invoked the right name.

They repeated what they had seen work before.  And it failed.

Not because the name of Jesus lacks power.  Because they lacked relationship.

The demon answered them plainly: “Jesus I know, and Paul I recognize, but who are you?”

The problem wasn’t pronunciation.  It was possession.

They borrowed language without owning allegiance.


✒️ Forge:  Knowledge Without Knowing

This isn’t new.

In the garden, the serpent introduced doubt by reframing God’s command (Genesis 3:1).  Adam (or Eve) added to what God had said (Genesis 3:3).  The command was simple.  The understanding was shallow.

They had instruction.  They lacked comprehension of consequence.

Hosea 4:6  My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge; because you have rejected knowledge, I reject you from being a priest to me.  And since you have forgotten the law of your God, I also will forget your children.(ESV)

“My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge.”  Not lack of information.  Lack of knowing.

Jesus didn’t come merely to give new commands.  He came to make the Father known (John 17:3).

There’s a difference between reciting truth and being transformed by it.

A prayer repeated without understanding isn’t surrender.  Words spoken without conviction aren’t repentance.

Romans 10:9–10  (9)because, if you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved.  (10)For with the heart one believes and is justified, and with the mouth one confesses and is saved.(ESV)

Confession and belief aren’t mechanical steps.  They’re realities of the heart.

The sons of Sceva treated authority as transferable language.  They assumed power could be accessed through imitation.

They were wrong.


⚒️ Anvil:  Ignorance Is Still a Choice

It was a lack of understanding that enabled the fall.  They didn’t fully grasp what they were surrendering.

Jesus teaches us to avoid that mistake again and again.

John 8:31–32  (31)So Jesus said to the Jews who had believed him, “If you abide in my word, you are truly my disciples, (32)and you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.”(ESV)

Truth sets free when it is known — not merely heard.  Choosing to remain shallow is still a decision.

No one is expected to know everything.  Growth doesn’t require omniscience.  It requires depth.

Roots and fruit must grow together.

Colossians 2:6–7  (6)Therefore, as you received Christ Jesus the Lord, so walk in him, (7)rooted and built up in him and established in the faith, just as you were taught, abounding in thanksgiving.(ESV)

If fruit grows heavier than roots can support, the plant collapses.  Influence without depth destroys itself.  Charisma without character implodes.  Public strength without private formation fractures.

If roots grow deep but fruit never forms, the plant becomes sterile.  Knowledge hoarded without obedience becomes pride.

James 2:17  So also faith by itself, if it does not have works, is dead.(ESV)

Faith without works is dead.  Understanding must produce obedience.  Obedience must be rooted in understanding.  Either imbalance leads to collapse.


🔥 Ember:  The Sinner’s Prayer and the Second Fall

This is where we must be direct.  Repeating words isn’t salvation.  Jesus isn’t accessed by formula.

Matthew 7:13–14  (13)“Enter by the narrow gate.  For the gate is wide and the way is easy that leads to destruction, and those who enter by it are many.  (14)For the gate is narrow and the way is hard that leads to life, and those who find it are few.(ESV)

The narrow way isn’t narrow because the words are difficult.  It’s narrow because surrender is.

If someone repeats a prayer without grasping repentance, lordship, surrender, and relationship, what has changed?

The sons of Sceva repeated the name without submission.  They wanted power without transformation.

The danger isn’t in teaching people to confess Christ.  The danger is teaching them to do so without teaching them what it means.

Choosing ignorance is still choosing.  Growth requires roots and fruit together.

Understanding without obedience is sterile.  Obedience without understanding is fragile.

Both collapse under pressure.


🌿 Covenant Triumph:  Owned Fire

Jesus didn’t borrow authority.  He embodied it.

After the wilderness, He emerged “in the power of the Spirit” (Luke 4:14).  Authority followed surrender.

The second Adam didn’t repeat the first mistake.

Philippians 2:8–11  (8)And being found in human form, he humbled himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross.  (9)Therefore God has highly exalted him and bestowed on him the name that is above every name, (10)so that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth, (11)and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.(ESV)

He humbled Himself.  Therefore God exalted Him.

Owned fire doesn’t collapse when tested.  What is rooted deeply can bear weight.

The question isn’t whether you know the right words.  The question is whether those words have taken root deeply enough to survive the storm.

Because what is borrowed will fail.  And what fails under pressure can’t shape the generation that follows.


[⚓ Floatie] [✒️ Forge] [⚒️ Anvil] [🔥 Ember] [🌿 Covenant Triumph]
This post follows the Forge Baseline Rule—layered truth for the discerning remnant.

4 responses to “Practical Christianity:  The Weight of What We Teach Part 3: Borrowed Fire”

  1. RW - Disciple of Yahshua Avatar
    RW – Disciple of Yahshua

    “Jesus didn’t come merely to give new commands.  He came to make the Father known (John 17:3).”

    He didn’t come to give new commands at all, but to show us how to keep the commands of YHWH.

    Colossians 2:6–7  (6)Therefore, as you received Christ Jesus the Lord, so walk in him, (7)rooted and built up in him and established in the faith, just as you were taught, abounding in thanksgiving.(ESV)

    What faith had they been and were they being taught?

    Hint: The new testament hadn’t been written yet.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Don Avatar
      Don

      Yes, the New Testament hadn’t been written yet. The apostles were teaching from what we now call the Old Testament, but they weren’t teaching in Torah isolation. They were teaching Christ as the fulfillment of it. Jesus didn’t just model obedience. He redefined the covenant (Luke 22:20). And He absolutely did give new commands (John 13:34).

      Even the early church had to wrestle with this. Acts 15 makes it clear they didn’t place gentile believers under the law of Moses. Same scriptures, different framework. The difference isn’t the text. It’s the lens, which is Jesus.

      Like

  2. RW - Disciple of Yahshua Avatar
    RW – Disciple of Yahshua

    I’m not sure what you mean by “Torah isolation”, please explain this term a little more.

    Both the Luke 22:20 and John 13:34 passages reference a renewed, not new covenant. Same covenant, same creator, same Son, same Torah.

    Luke 22:20 Likewise the cup also, after supper, saying, “This cup is the renewed covenant in My blood which is shed for you.

    John 13:34 “A renewed command I give to you, that you love one another, as I have loved you, that you also love one another.

    Acts 15 was giving them the bare minimum of things they needed to abstain from. Even new believers now, we don’t expect them to know everything, but we walk alongside them and teach them along the way, but there are certain things that we teach them are the minimum. Minimums are required to be saved, however, the more relationship we have with Yahshua, the more we want to be with and the more we are able to be obedient. The very next chapter in John 14:15 “If you love Me, you shall guard My commands.” We’ve already established that the commands they were being taught were the Torah and the Prophets.

    The primary Ancient Greek word for “guard” is φύλαξ (phúlax), referring to a watcher, keeper, sentinel, or protector. It originates from the verb φυλάσσω (phylassō), meaning to watch, defend, or preserve

    Obeying commands is not a work to obtain salvation, but an expression of love for salvation. Complete doesn’t mean fulfill and it never has to be done again. Yahshua walked out Torah perfectly and showed us how to do the same. He said if we love him, we will guard His commands.

    Matthew 5:17-18 Do not think that I came to destroy the Torah or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to complete.

    For truly, I say to you, till the heaven and the earth pass away, one yod or one tittle shall by no means pass from the Torah till all be done.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Don Avatar
      Don

      I think we’re actually closer on the problem than it seems — but you’re collapsing a distinction Scripture doesn’t.

      When I said “Torah in isolation,” I meant treating the Law as a complete system apart from Christ’s fulfillment of it. The apostles never taught it that way after the resurrection.

      On the “renewed vs new” point—this really comes down to the actual language. The word used in Luke 22:20 and John 13:34 is kainos, which means new in kind, not just refreshed. Hebrews 8:13 makes the implication explicit — the old covenant is made obsolete in light of the new.

      That doesn’t mean the Law was wrong. It means it reached its purpose. Acts 15 is where this gets clearest. The apostles explicitly refused to place Gentile believers under the Law, not as a starting point, and not as a later goal. Peter even calls it a yoke no one could bear.

      And when Jesus says “If you love me, keep my commands,” He’s not pointing backward to a system, He’s pointing to Himself. His commands are centered on abiding, believing, and loving as He loved, which goes beyond Torah, not back into it.

      So yes, obedience matters. Deeply. But the source has changed.

      Not law -> obedience. Christ -> transformation -> obedience.

      Same God. Same story. But not the same covenant structure.

      Like

Leave a reply to Don Cancel reply

Who am I?

I’ve walked a path I didn’t ask for, guided by a God I can’t ignore. I don’t wear titles well—writer, teacher, leader—they fit like borrowed armor. But I know this: I’ve bled truth onto a page, challenged what I was told to swallow, and led only because I refused to follow where I couldn’t see Christ.

I don’t see greatness in the mirror. I see someone ordinary, shaped by pain and made resilient through it. I’m not above anyone. I’m not below anyone. I’m just trying to live what I believe and document the war inside so others know they aren’t alone.

If you’re looking for polished answers, you won’t find them here.
But if you’re looking for honesty, tension, paradox, and a relentless pursuit of truth,
you’re in the right place.

If you’re unsure of what path to follow or disillusioned with the world today and are willing to walk with me along this path I follow, you’ll never be alone. Everyone is welcome and invited to participate as much as they feel comfortable with.

Now, welcome home. I’m Don.

Let’s connect