Practical Christianity:  From the Beginning Part 1 — Failed Authority

(Part 1 of 10)

Floatie:  Authority Failed Before Sin Was Punished

Genesis 3:12–13  (12)The man said, “The woman whom you gave to be with me, she gave me fruit of the tree, and I ate.”  (13)Then the Lord God said to the woman, “What is this that you have done?”  The woman said, “The serpent deceived me, and I ate.”(ESV)

Genesis 2:15–17  (15)The Lord God took the man and put him in the garden of Eden to work it and keep it.  (16)And the Lord God commanded the man, saying, “You may surely eat of every tree of the garden, (17)but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat of it you shall surely die.”(ESV)

The first leadership failure in Scripture doesn’t begin with rebellion.  It begins with abdication.

The text doesn’t tell us where Adam was when the serpent spoke to Eve.  It doesn’t tell us how much time passed between the command (“don’t eat the fruit”) and the fall.  It doesn’t tell us whether the conversation unfolded in moments or over days.

Scripture is silent on those details.  But Scripture isn’t silent about responsibility.

When God confronts Adam, the question isn’t what he heard or where he stood.
The question is why the one entrusted with authority failed to guard what he was given.


✒️ Forge:  Authority Is Defined by Charge, Not Proximity

Genesis 1:26–28  (26)Then God said, “Let us make man in our image, after our likeness.  And let them have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over the livestock and over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.”  (27)So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them.  (28)And God blessed them.  And God said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth and subdue it, and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over every living thing that moves on the earth.”(ESV)

Genesis 2:18  Then the Lord God said, “It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him a helper fit for him.”(ESV)

From the beginning, authority is assigned before conflict appears.

Adam is given charge over the garden—to work it and to keep it.  That language isn’t passive.  It implies stewardship, protection, and restraint.  Authority, biblically, is never defined as constant supervision.  It’s defined as responsibility for outcomes.

Whether Adam was physically present or absent when deception began is secondary.  What matters is that deception entered a space he was entrusted to guard.

This establishes a crucial pattern:  Authority does not fail only when it acts wrongly.
It fails when it doesn’t act at all.

Distance doesn’t dissolve responsibility.  Silence doesn’t nullify charge.


⚒️ Anvil:  Blame Does Not Transfer Responsibility

Genesis 3:12  The man said, “The woman whom you gave to be with me, she gave me fruit of the tree, and I ate.”(ESV)

Genesis 3:17  And to Adam he said, “Because you have listened to the voice of your wife and have eaten of the tree of which I commanded you, ‘You shall not eat of it,’ cursed is the ground because of you; in pain you shall eat of it all the days of your life;(ESV)

When confronted, Adam doesn’t deny the event.  He reframes his role in it.  “The woman you gave me.”  The statement does more than shift blame to Eve.  It subtly reframes Adam as a participant rather than a steward—as someone affected by events rather than responsible for them.

But Scripture refuses that framing.

Judgment falls not because Adam was deceived, but because he was entrusted.  Responsibility was assigned regardless of proximity, timing, or awareness.  Authority carries weight even when it claims distance.

This is the first great illusion of leadership:

  • I wasn’t there.
  • I didn’t initiate it.
  • I didn’t know in time.
  • Others made their own choices.

None of those erase responsibility.  They never have.


🔥 Ember:  The Oldest Leadership Lie

James 4:17  So whoever knows the right thing to do and fails to do it, for him it is sin.(ESV)

Romans 5:12  Therefore, just as sin came into the world through one man, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men because all sinned—(ESV)

The most dangerous lie authority tells itself isn’t, “I did nothing wrong.”  It’s, “I’m not responsible for what happened.”

From the beginning, authority has attempted to redefine itself as influence rather than obligation.  Adam’s defense isn’t denial.  It’s distance.

Scripture doesn’t accept that defense.

Where authority exists, accountability follows.  Knowledge increases responsibility, but absence doesn’t remove it.  Silence becomes a decision.  Inaction becomes participation.

This isn’t a modern failure.  It’s the first one recorded.

Every future collapse of leadership—whether moral, spiritual, or institutional—will echo this same attempt to separate authority from consequence.


🌿 Covenant Triumph:  Responsibility Is the Cost of Authority

Luke 12:48  But the one who did not know, and did what deserved a beating, will receive a light beating.  Everyone to whom much was given, of him much will be required, and from him to whom they entrusted much, they will demand the more.(ESV)

Ezekiel 33:6  But if the watchman sees the sword coming and does not blow the trumpet, so that the people are not warned, and the sword comes and takes any one of them, that person is taken away in his iniquity, but his blood I will require at the watchman’s hand.(ESV)

From the beginning, authority has never been about control.  It’s always been about ownership of consequence.

Adam didn’t lose the garden because he lacked power.  He lost it because he failed to carry the weight of what he was given.

Covenant authority isn’t measured by how close you stand to the problem, but by whether you accept responsibility when the problem appears.

That has never changed.  The solution has never been perfection.  It’s always been ownership.

Where This Leaves the Reader

This message doesn’t require Adam to be standing beside Eve.  It requires something far more uncomfortable.

It requires accepting that responsibility exists even when authority claims distance.

Before kings, before priests, before prophets, authority failed because it refused to own the space it was given.  Everything that follows in Scripture is an echo of this moment.

From the beginning, authority didn’t fail because it was corrupt.  It failed because it refused to carry the weight entrusted to it.  And that is where this series must begin.


[⚓ Floatie] [✒️ Forge] [⚒️ Anvil] [🔥 Ember] [🌿 Covenant Triumph]
This post follows the Forge Baseline Rule—layered truth for the discerning remnant.

8 responses to “Practical Christianity:  From the Beginning Part 1 — Failed Authority”

  1. RW - Disciple of Yahshua Avatar
    RW – Disciple of Yahshua

    “Authority, biblically, is never defined as constant supervision.  It’s defined as responsibility for outcomes.”

    I’m reserved in anticipation to hear more of the series, but I’m paying close attention with what I’m currently seeing as a contradiction in statements from previous parts of the “Practical Christianity” series.

    We’ve just finished messages where being responsible for outcomes is expressed as a lack of trust in Abba’s provision and plan and is taking on the authority we weren’t assigned and assigning the responsibililty unto ourselves.

    Let me ask for some clarity about this in a bibllical story. We’ve all hopefully read the story of and if not read ourselves, at least been taught at some point about “The Prodigal Son”. There are many aspects to this story, but the one I’m asking about is in response to the quoted statement.

    Was it the father’s responsibility that the son chose to receive early and/or squander his portion of the inheritance? As the father is he assumed to be responsible for the outcomes of his son’s choices? The quote seems to imply this, but I don’t believe scripture supports this. Interested to hear your thoughts…

    Deḇarim (Deuteronomy) 24:16 Fathers are not put to death for their children, and children are not put to death for their fathers, each is to die for his own sin.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Don Avatar
      Don

      That’s a fair question, and it’s a category distinction Scripture makes carefully. Deuteronomy addresses moral guilt—who bears judgment for sin. Authority and stewardship are different. The father in the prodigal story is not guilty of his son’s sin, but he is still responsible for how he carries his role as father before, during, and after the rebellion. Responsibility for outcomes is not control over choices; it’s accountability for how entrusted authority is exercised. Adam, Saul, and Eli were judged not for causing sin, but for how they handled the authority God gave them once sin was present.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. RW - Disciple of Yahshua Avatar
        RW – Disciple of Yahshua

        Isn’t bearing judgement for sin addressing authority and stewardship of our own choices and actions?

        Liked by 1 person

      2. Don Avatar
        Don

        Deuteronomy 24:16 addresses personal guilt and limits human courts from punishing people for others’ sins in a fallen world. Adam’s situation is different. He isn’t being judged by a human legal system but by God as a covenant head. Eve bears guilt for her sin, but Adam bears responsibility for the covenant breach because the command was given to him and the covenant flows through him. Scripture consistently treats those as related but distinct categories.

        Two points:
        No one bears moral guilt for another person’s sin.
        But Scripture also insists on something equally true: those entrusted with authority answer first when what they were given is corrupted.

        Liked by 1 person

      3. RW - Disciple of Yahshua Avatar
        RW – Disciple of Yahshua

        I definitely agree with the two points and that two things can be true at the same time.

        I would also like to state that the legal system that was given to Mosheh (Moses), recorded in Deuteronomy, was and is covenant to all believers.

        Mattithyahu (Matthew) 5:18
        For truly, I say to you, till the heaven and the earth pass away, one yod or one tittle shall by no means pass from the Torah till all be done.

        Liked by 1 person

      4. Don Avatar
        Don

        I agree that God’s law is covenantally true and fulfilled, not discarded. Matthew 5:18 affirms that. The distinction I’m making isn’t about whether Torah stands, but how it functions across covenantal contexts. Deuteronomy 24:16 governs human courts in a fallen world to prevent abuse of authority. Adam’s accountability precedes that framework and is treated differently by Scripture itself, as later texts consistently attribute the fall to Adam as covenant head. The law remains true, but Scripture does not apply every legal statute uniformly across redemptive history.

        Like

    2. Don Avatar
      Don

      Adam’s case is unique in Scripture. Eve sins first, but Adam is held responsible because the command was given to him and the covenant flows through him. Later Scripture consistently attributes the fall to Adam, not Eve. That doesn’t negate Eve’s guilt, but it does establish Adam as a covenant head whose responsibility extends beyond his own action. Deuteronomy addresses individual guilt in a fallen legal system; Adam’s accountability precedes that framework entirely.

      Like

      1. RW - Disciple of Yahshua Avatar
        RW – Disciple of Yahshua

        Please elaborate on “fallen legal system “…

        Like

Leave a comment

Who am I?

I’ve walked a path I didn’t ask for, guided by a God I can’t ignore. I don’t wear titles well—writer, teacher, leader—they fit like borrowed armor. But I know this: I’ve bled truth onto a page, challenged what I was told to swallow, and led only because I refused to follow where I couldn’t see Christ.

I don’t see greatness in the mirror. I see someone ordinary, shaped by pain and made resilient through it. I’m not above anyone. I’m not below anyone. I’m just trying to live what I believe and document the war inside so others know they aren’t alone.

If you’re looking for polished answers, you won’t find them here.
But if you’re looking for honesty, tension, paradox, and a relentless pursuit of truth,
you’re in the right place.

If you’re unsure of what path to follow or disillusioned with the world today and are willing to walk with me along this path I follow, you’ll never be alone. Everyone is welcome and invited to participate as much as they feel comfortable with.

Now, welcome home. I’m Don.

Let’s connect